great read…
http://www.snagajob.com/job-seeker/jobs/job-details.aspx?postingId=4171202&ref=vseindeed
great read…
http://www.snagajob.com/job-seeker/jobs/job-details.aspx?postingId=4171202&ref=vseindeed
The news article below updates us on a current arrest involving superstar Jeff Hardy.
First, I encourage everyone to offer support for Jeff and the other superstars of WWE who will no doubt get scarred with the negative media attention this arrest will bring. We should also not forget the reality of being innocent until proven guilty that still exists here in the US.
The issue of drugs in wrestling and the tragedies that they have led to is far too common for my comfort. I count over 40 deaths in the last decade attributable to drugs in wrestling.
I don’t blame the WWE, but I wish they would implement a comprehensive benefits package for those superstars past and present that work for them over an extended period of time. I believe this as a fan and a shareholder of WWE.
To take drugs to perform, deal with pain, or feel better is a personal decision that is made by the individual superstar. You cannot legislate good decisions or common sense, it is up to us as individuals to be accountable for those decisions. It should also not be missed that many superstars make bad choices in an effort to provide themselves an advantage in earning potential.
Our colleagues in professional wrestling wrestle 275+ days a year which is in and of itself a unbelievable toll on their bodies. The concept of the show must go on is true and real in todays television cycle. A superstar that sits out for a few weeks with injuries needs to contemplate the effect it will have on their longevity with the company and current storyline. It is their decision and we should not forget that.
The WWE, TNA and others should ensure that they are reasonable with their demands and have incentives in place for medical illness and addictions issues. I have heard from many that the WWE does indeed help present and past superstars with addiction issues. I am unclear if there are medical benefit plans in place, but there should be.
One solution to the benefits issue could be to have our WWE entertainers be covered under the SAG, (Screen Actors Guild) and receive benefits through them.
I also believe we fans or marks have a responsibility as well. I am not sure how we can participate in helping these entertainers who work very hard to entertain us, but I think we need to give it some real thought.
These thoughts are from Paul Jones a fan/mark, wrestling historian and collector. Paul is a business executive outside of the wrestling circle.
_______________________________________________________________
Posted Sep 11, 2009 5:30PM By Ryan Wilson (RSS feed)
Filed Under: PEDs, Pro Wrestling, Twitter
WWE’s Jeff Hardy was arrested and jailed in North Carolina on Friday after authorities searched his home and found enough drugs to start a small pharmacy. Via ProWrestling.net, police “discovered 262 Vicodin pills, 180 Soma pills, 555 milliliters of anabolic steroids, and a residual amount of powder cocaine and items of drug paraphernalia.”
Apparently, you just can’t just stockpile this stuff in your industrial-sized medicine cabinet with the intent to start your own business. Even if you own one of those white lab coats.
The WWE star is facing “two counts of felony possession with intent to sell or deliver a schedule three controlled substance, felony maintaining a dwelling to keep a controlled substance, felony possession of cocaine, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia.”
Hardy’s brother posted his bail — allegedly $125,000 — which, as PWTorch.com’s James Caldwell writes, “… doesn’t seem like a very smart investment” for “an estimated $2,500 worth of drugs.” No, no it doesn’t.
For his part, Hardy tweets that the news of his arrest has been blown out of proportion. “A lot of exaggerations are out there today, don’t believe everything you read 4 it is not true, I am at home and fine-thanks for your concern.”
by Bara Vaida
Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009
In April, many executives from the nation’s retail sector were excited by the news that a longtime dream was about to come true. The boards of the industry’s two largest trade and lobbying groups — the National Retail Federation and the Retail Industry Leaders Association, both based in Washington — had agreed to merge.
“With the changes in the political environment in Washington, the value of a unified voice goes up, and we thought we’d give [the merger] a try,” said Philip Francis, executive chairman of PetSmart, whose company is a member of both the NRF and RILA. Francis is also vice chairman of the retail federation’s board.
The timing was good, because long-serving federation President and CEO Tracy Mullin had announced she was retiring at the end of 2009. Mergers between big trade groups are often spurred by the departure of a chief executive. But two months after both organizations conducted due diligence, RILA’s board voted against the merger. The NRF’s vote, which had been scheduled for July, never occurred because the two groups announced on June 24 that they had abandoned their marriage plans.
Six weeks later, Mullin still isn’t sure what went wrong. “I don’t think we know exactly what happened,” she said in an interview. “It was fairly unusual. I don’t know specifically what prompted the collapse, but it’s done.”
RILA President Sandy Kennedy said: “Both organizations are bound by a nondisclosure agreement and can’t talk about the specifics of the merger. But I can say that we led a deliberative process, and based on the facts [from] the due diligence, we voted not to go forward.”
It is rare for organizations’ boards to agree to pursue a merger and then abandon the effort so far along in the process, said CEO Update Managing Director Mark Graham, whose publication covers the trade association industry. “Many association mergers do fail,” he said, “just not this late in the game, because it’s bad press and it leaves unanswered questions.”
Indeed, the reasons for the collapse of the marriage between the NRF, which represents 2,500 retailers and vendors, and RILA, which represents 200, have caused plenty of buzz and puzzlement on K Street.
Some sources speculated that RILA wasn’t happy with what it learned about the NRF’s finances during the due-diligence process. Kennedy wouldn’t comment on that point. She did say that the inquiry involved looking at the federation’s membership governance, bylaws, and the entire organization’s structure.
“It goes both ways, by the way; they looked at ours as well,” she said.
RILA’s 2008 revenue totaled $12.1 million, based on its May 2009 audit report. The NRF reported revenue of $31.4 million for 2007, according to its Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service.
“I do know that there was a vote [by RILA] against moving forward after some due diligence,” said Nate Garvis, vice president of government affairs and senior public affairs officer at Target, which is a member of RILA but not the NRF. The board must “have run into something that didn’t look pretty, right?” he said, stressing, however, that he had not seen the due-diligence report.
Over the past 15 years, the retail sector has experienced tremendous economic upheaval and consolidation, leading to a decline in the number of large department stores and retailers in the U.S. One of the NRF’s big members, Home Depot, recently dropped out but kept its membership with RILA. Target left the federation about four years ago, Garvis said.
Mullin and PetSmart’s Francis vehemently dismissed talk of possible financial problems at the federation. Francis said that the NRF added 200 members this year and that in most years the federation posts an operating profit of about $1 million. Mullin said that her group has “$20 million in cash and assets.” Member dues account for 19 percent of the trade group’s total revenue, so losing Home Depot was a small “blip,” she said. (Home Depot’s dues were about $100,000 annually, according to a source.)
When asked if the NRF was facing financial difficulties, Francis told National Journal: “There are quite a few folks on the [NRF] board who read P&L [profit and loss] sheets, and I can’t even think of any scenario where that is true.”
Another theory is that the cultures of the two organizations were too different to meld. The NRF (originally called the National Retail Dry Goods Association) was launched in New York City in 1911 by department store executives. (It is now based in downtown Washington.) Macy’s and Sears were among its founding members. Today it represents a mix of retailers from department stores to catalogue companies to e-commerce firms.
In the late 1960s, Sam Walton, Wal-Mart’s founder, tried to join the NRF but was rebuffed because “the department store owners didn’t want to mix with a discounter,” one retail source said. So in 1969, Wal-Mart and 20 other companies co-founded the Mass Retailing Institute, which later became RILA. The group, based in Arlington, Va., represents some of the country’s largest retailers, among them Wal-Mart, Safeway, and Lowe’s. Wal-Mart never did become an NRF member.
RILA, with a staff of 33, devotes about a third of its budget to public policy issues and the rest to conferences and other programs to support retail businesses. In 2008, annual membership dues, education programs, and a special dues assessment each accounted for one-third of RILA’s revenue.
Both groups spend about the same on lobbying. In the first half of 2009, RILA doled out $910,000 on lobbying, while the federation ponied up $940,000, according to lobbying disclosure forms.
The NRF, which employs 99 people, plays aggressively in the public policy arena, but its annual convention in New York City is its biggest cash cow. It also has several divisions: the Association for Retail Technology Standards; the National Council of Chain Restaurants; the Retail Advertising & Marketing Association; and Shop.org. It has a research group and a foundation.
“We are very different from RILA,” Mullin said. “We have very different cultures.” She said that her group’s members “started raising questions about all the services that NRF offers” and expressed concerns that those services might be lost.
Wal-Mart’s public policy approaches may have played a role in the failed marriage by underscoring the irreconcilable differences between the groups. On June 30, just a few days after the merger talks collapsed, Wal-Mart stunned the business community by joining with the powerful Service Employees International Union and the left-leaning Center for American Progress to endorse a mandate requiring employers to provide health care coverage to their workers.
Mullin publicly condemned Wal-Mart’s decision. In a July 13 open letter to the NRF’s members, she called the company’s move “troubling” and urged her members to fight the employer mandate. RILA did not join with the NRF in condemning Wal-Mart.
“We’d rather take a more balanced approach,” said Kennedy, who denied that Wal-Mart had blocked RILA from publicly opposing the company’s employer-mandate position. “When the [congressional] proposals come out, we will react appropriately. We’d prefer to take a more measured approach so we can participate in shaping the policy.”
Kennedy also disputes the notion that public policy differences between the two groups killed the merger, insisting that the topic “wasn’t even discussed” by her board when it was deciding to vote. She also emphasized that Wal-Mart’s dues are no greater than any other members’ and that the company doesn’t “dominate” the organization. She said she “didn’t believe” that there had been any plans to reduce the number of services that NRF members receive had the merger gone through.
“The thing that made this [merger] such an interesting proposition is that we had little overlap, and we saw this as an opportunity to build on the strength of both organizations,” Kennedy said.
Whatever happens between the two groups in the future will not take place on Mullin’s watch, even though she has postponed her departure from the NRF until June 2010. In the next several weeks, she said, her group will hire a search firm to find a new leader, and she’ll be engaged in the process.
“At the 60,000-foot level, I think the two [groups] being together makes sense today. But at the detail level, it became much harder,” PetSmart’s Francis said. “I think [talks about a merger] will sit dormant for a while.”
8037 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 400 ▪ Charlotte, North Carolina 28226 ▪ WWW.losspreventionfoundation.org
PRESS RELEASE
The Loss Prevention Foundation’s mission is to develop certification and on-line educational resources. In addition, a major objective is to increase the awareness for our profession with the academic community, thus increasing the candidate flow with more college graduates. We are proud to announce tremendous progress with this mission.
The Loss Prevention Foundation recently attended the Academy of Criminal Justice Academy’s annual conference which convened simultaneously with the national conference for the National Criminal Justice Honor Society, Alpha Phi Sigma. In a joint sponsorship with The LossPrevention Magazine, the foundation awarded 15 scholarships valued at $500 each, to students who expressed an interest in loss prevention. In recognizing academic excellence, students had at least a 3.2 grade point average to qualify. Recipients represented 9 different universities.
|
Auburn University at Montgomery |
|
Boise State University |
|
Colorado Technical University |
|
Florida International University |
|
Minnesota State University |
|
Prairie View A&M University |
|
University of Houston Downtown |
|
University of Maryland Eastern Shore |
|
University of Nevada, Reno
|
The foundation spent several days networking with over 2000 university professors & students from hundreds of academic programs. The foundation’s national initiative of “educating the academic community on loss prevention being an excellent career alternative to the traditional criminal justice careers” clearly has tremendous momentum. Of special note is that the ACJS has a separate subsection for Security Management/Loss Prevention due to the increased demand of the private sector. The LossPrevention Magazine also participated by distributing hundreds of magazines and signing up dozens of professors to receive free subscriptions as well as giving them access to the on-line archives. Special recognition also goes to the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) for providing us with additional information to help promote our profession. This was the second year that the foundation has exhibited at this conference. Full page advertisement attracting graduates were also placed in both conference programs along with sponsorship of an Alpha Phi Sigma-LPF Scholarship and Reception event.
For more information on The Loss Prevention Foundation visit our website: www.losspreventionfoundation.org
For more information on Alpha Phi Sigma, visit: www.alphaphisigma.org/docket/DOCKETSpring2009.pdf
If you are formerly a member of Alpha Phi Sigma please contact: membership@alphaphisigma.org
The Loss Prevention Foundation is organized as a 501(c) (6) not-for-profit organization. For more information about The Loss Prevention Foundation, please contact Kelly Durham at Kelly.Durham@LossPreventionFoundation.org (704-405-4404) or Gene Smith at Gene.Smith@LossPreventionFoundation.org (704-837-2521).
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| Volume 3 – Issue 1 February 24, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Company Booth ADT Security AFA Protective Agilence, Inc. 517 American Dynamics, American Security Bass Security Services, Cambridge Security CAP Index, Inc. 216 CDC/NIOSH 207 Civil Demand ClickIt, Inc. 316 Corporate Safe Datascan, LP 210 Diebold Security 223 Digilock 617 DMP 407 Dunbar Armored 231 Enabl-u Technologies G4S Compliance & GE Security Hart Systems 507 InfoMart, Inc. 504 Jamison Door 201 KABA MAS 329 LexisNexis 528 LockNet 228 Loss Prevention Medeco High Security Metro One Loss MICROS-Retail 600 Mitsubishi Electric - Nutech National 307 Orion Systems 301 Pacific Handy Prepare Training Protex International Protos Security 623 RuMe Corp. 311 Sargent and Security Source 322 Send Word Now 325 SIRAS® 430 Stanley Convergent Sterling Testing StopLift Checkout Tellermate, Inc. 525 Universal U.S. Security WREN 404 |
|||||||||||||||
Note: To ensure delivery to your inbox please add william.price@retail-leaders.org to your address book.
Paul Jones a retail Loss Prevention expert recommends reading this article. Jones has 20+ years experience and is currently the VP of Asset Protection for The Retail Industry Leaders Association.
Jones believes after reviewing recent crime trends that retailers without the vision to continue funding of Loss Prevention initiatives may experience a significant increase in shrink…
If crime is increasing and you choose to reduce store payroll and Loss Prevention intiatives you stand a good chance of increased shrinkage.
| Down economy see rise in shoplifting across state NJ.com – NJ,USA “We’re gearing up for some of the worst retail theft numbers we’ve seen,” said Paul Jones, vice president of asset protection for the Retail Industry … |
S PREVENTION
Loss Prevention 2012:
Cutting-Edge
Technology
And Highly Qualified
Talent
Technology is evolving quickly, and these advancements will be essential for
success in the future.
The Retail Solutions Update www.retailsolutionsonline.com 8
BY PAUL JONES
As you read this article, you have been struggling with several
months of stress trying to match your business plans with volatile
and uncontrollable world conditions. These conditions are
challenging retailers, who are trying to lower shrink and meet
profit goals.
Retailers and great merchants are described as having the
ability to see around corners and anticipate the future, like
modern day soothsayers. I am the first to admit that you would
not want to hire me to predict the next fashion trends. However,
I would like to take a moment and provide you with my vision for
technology and loss prevention as I feel it should look for loss
prevention teams in 2012.
After reviewing the landmark report, “Effective Retail Loss
Prevention,” by Adrian Beck from the University of Leicester, it
is apparent to me the degree to which technology is being
embraced by retailers. These retailers are incorporating the
cutting-edge technology in their loss prevention efforts at a
much higher rate than the laggards. The use of data sharing and
technology as a method to assist retailers in combating organized
retail crime is highlighted in the October 2008 national report on
organized retail crime conducted by Dr. Read Hayes, director for
the Loss Prevention Research Council and the Retail Industry
Leaders Association (RILA).
In my experience leading loss prevention teams, this
technology, which is featured in the report, is critical for success
in combating the new frontier of loss prevention efforts. The
functionality and advancements of the technology are evolving
quickly and will become essential for success in the future. In
the ensuing comments, I will be painting a picture of the
technology that may be used by loss prevention teams in 2012.
Pre-Employment Screening
The new-hire screening and orientation process will become a
more scrupulous and in-depth procedure. We will start by having
all applicants fill out an electronic application, which is hosted on
the career Internet sites. This form of application would
incorporate the pre-employment test, which was formerly a
written process. The second phase of testing would include a
screen of the quality of the applicant’s past retail experience.
This would use compiled information regarding an associate’s
former productivity with their last company. The result is a pool
of qualified candidates that would continue to partake in the
application process. The ensuing candidates then would be
screened for criminal backgrounds and negative employment
issues. The screening process likely would incorporate reviews of
social networking sites, such as Facebook, MySpace, Plaxo,
LinkedIn, and YouTube. Any online personal existence now will
be subject to scrutiny during the employment application.
On-Boarding — Training
The hired candidate will immediately be on-boarded with a new
interactive scenario-based training program. He/she will learn
skills to reduce shrink and loss, as well as effective selling skills.
In most retailers, these programs already are in place but often
are not leveraged to work in conjunction with each other. Loss
prevention associates will need to have their loss prevention
qualified (LPQ) certification and loss prevention certified
(LPC) status to accompany their other technical training, such
as Wicklander & Zulawski’s CFI or ASIS’s CPP-CFE.
Loss Prevention Technology
Cameras will be used more frequently by 2012. Utilizing cameras
for managing operations as well as loss prevention will finally
come to fruition with the advent of IP (Internet protocol) video
joined with video analytic programs. These will be tied into
associate phones and wireless devices. The video analytic
programs will ensure we are executing this technology with the
most effective techniques.
Exception-based reporting has done a sufficient job for
retailers over the last decade; nonetheless, this technology is
being retooled to be more effective. By 2012, the leaders in loss
prevention will integrate exception reporting into the POS
systems and begin triggering exceptions in real time. Exception
reporting will be completely merged with IP video and will be
LOSS PREVENTION
used frequently to mine exceptions with known loss tracking,
cycle counting, refund management, accident frequency, and
inventory control issues as opposed to just supporting POS data.
I would recommend exception reporting systems be merged
with your wireless audit devices. This will allow you to compile
your store audit data and case management system, thus creating
one complete enterprise loss prevention solution (ELPS).
ELPS will allow us to have all loss prevention technology
housed in one data warehouse with each working in sync with
the other areas of loss prevention solutions. This will result in us
being able to manage and deploy loss prevention resources in a
more effective and efficient manner. We will have access to an
actionable dashboard that encompasses all loss prevention issues
from investigations to risk. Loss prevention professionals will
have admission into a community with leading and easy-to-use
technological solutions. Top talent truly engages at a high level
when supported with technology.
Of all the solutions and applications available to retailers today,
I believe that refund management is the most underutilized. I
feel there is more money to save by effectively implementing a
data-centric integrated refund management program than many
of the other technology projects on the drawing board. I only
know of one solution provider today, The Retail Equation, that
has a solution for this problem. Many retailers have implemented
in-house systems that add value, but the increased data analytics
provided by The Retail Equation’s solution can save you millions
of dollars in shrink and refund expenses, and drive profitable
sales. Because it is so data-centric, it only touches those
customers who you absolutely cannot afford to keep. It is now
offering a sales bounce-back piece that is performing at a higher
rate than many direct marketing models. Talk about a win-win
situation.
By 2012, I foresee that we will begin to share refund data and
have refund processes to monitor this function. It will begin to
take place seamlessly at every retailer today and will be similar to
the processes we use to authorize credit cards and checks. It will
act as a central repository of information that will make our
decisions more intelligent.
EAS systems will continue to refine their offerings and will
begin experimenting in a broader sense, conjoining the use of
EAS with RFID tags. This will assist in theft detection at the
shelf or rack level, conjointly applying the benefits of a more
accurate in-stock position. The EAS systems of 2012 will contain
a standard feature at the entrances and in key locations
throughout the stores. The systems will be able to detect the
“booster bags,” which are lined with aluminum foil and currently
defeat most EAS and RFID tags. Providers of this technology
will need to produce a solution that allows tags to be read
through aluminum-lined bags to remain viable.
The use of cycle counting will evolve and replace full
inventories. In some cases, it will become a key tool in managing
shrink for retailers, entirely replacing the process we know today
for physical inventories. Cycle count data also will be used to
deploy resources, coordinate interventions, and trigger a physical
inventory. This will give it a vital and necessary place in the loss
prevention dashboard that is part of our new ELPS. Many
retailers will begin to inventory higher selling merchandise at
more frequent intervals to drive sales and reduce losses. The
POS systems will have wireless scanners that will be used for ad
hoc cycle counting. Inventory will transform from an event to a
consistent everyday operation. This will allow retailers to shift
from third-party management of inventories on a semi-annual
basis. Retailers will be able to utilize this savings and apply it to
the technological advancement and implementation that will be
required of them in the future.
Loss Prevention Talent
Loss prevention will continue to make progress in talent and the
ability to share loss prevention talent across an enterprise. One
concern that still troubles me is our industry’s record on
diversity. Unless readers of this article begin taking immediate
and needed action with an aggressive diversity strategy, we in the
loss prevention space will continue to be stragglers. It is
imperative that we have leaders who are diverse and represent
the broader population. My challenge to loss prevention leaders
is not to look for a silver bullet or a solution to come to you on
diversity. Instead, look inside your company for leaders who can
learn valuable loss prevention tactics, and recruit them. Then,
design your organization in a manner that will provide a learning
path for these leaders to apply their current proficiency, learn
new loss prevention skills, and grow within your pyramids.
Loss Prevention Leaders
Loss prevention leaders will continue to become integrated
members of the C-suite and be responsible for loss prevention,
enterprise risk management, crisis management, and safety. In
some cases, they will lead the inventory control efforts.
Moreover, I predict loss prevention leaders will continue to
migrate out of loss prevention into other areas within the
enterprise with increased responsibility. As always, loss
prevention leaders know how to work across functions and get
the job done.
Loss prevention has a great future, and I am excited to be a
component of this industry. As your RILA partner, I am available
to support you and your organization as you move forward to the
year 2012.
www.retailsolutionsonline.com The Retail Solutions Update 9
Paul Jones
is the vice president, asset protection for the Retail
Industry Leaders Association (RILA). He has more than 25 years of
retail loss prevention experience. In March 2008, he joined the RILA
and works with retailers, suppliers, and government agencies to
develop programs and support for the loss prevention industry. Prior to
joining the RILA, Paul was the senior vice president and chief security
officer for Limited Brands, a $10 billion, 4,000-store international
retailer. Paul led their loss prevention, security, brand protection, and crisis management
functions. He is the co-founder of LPjobs.com, vice chairman of the Loss Prevention
Foundation, and past president of the editorial board of
Loss Prevention Magazine
.
As Economy Dips, Arrests for Shoplifting Soar
By IAN URBINA and SEAN D. HAMILL
Published: December 22, 2008
Richard R. Johnson is the first to admit it was a bad idea.
Recently laid off from a job building trailers in Elkhart, Ind., Mr. Johnson came up a dollar short at Martin’s Supermarket last month when he went to buy a $4.99 bottle of sleep medication. So, “for some stupid reason,” he tried to shoplift it and was immediately arrested.
“I was desperate, I guess,” said Mr. Johnson, 25, who said he had never been arrested before. As the economy has weakened, shoplifting has increased, and retail security experts say the problem has grown worse this holiday season. Shoplifters are taking everything from compact discs and baby formula to gift cards and designer clothing.
Police departments across the country say that shoplifting arrests are 10 percent to 20 percent higher this year than last. The problem is probably even greater than arrest records indicate since shoplifters are often banned from stores rather than arrested.
Much of the increase has come from first-time offenders like Mr. Johnson making rash decisions in a pinch, the authorities say. But the ease with which stolen goods can be sold on the Internet has meant a bigger role for organized crime rings, which also engage in receipt fraud, fake price tagging and gift card schemes, the police and security experts say.
And as temptation has grown for potential thieves, so too has stores’ vulnerability.
“More people are desperate economically, retailers are operating with leaner staffs and police forces are cutting back or being told to deprioritize shoplifting calls,” said Paul Jones, the vice president of asset protection for the Retail Industry Leaders Association.
The problem, he said, could be particularly acute this December, “the month of the year when shoplifting always goes way up.”
Two of the largest retail associations say that more than 80 percent of their members are reporting sharp increases in shoplifting, according to surveys conducted in the last two months.
Compounding the problem, stores are more reluctant to stop suspicious customers because they fear scaring away much-needed business. And retailers are increasingly trying to save money by hiring seasonal workers who, security experts say, are themselves more likely to commit fraud or theft and are less practiced at catching shoplifters than full-time employees are.
More than $35 million in merchandise is stolen each day nationwide, and about one in 11 people in America have shoplifted, according to the nonprofit National Association for Shoplifting Prevention.
“We used to see more repeat offenders doing it because of drug addiction,” said Samyah Jubran, an assistant district attorney in Knoxville who for 13 years has handled the bulk of the shoplifting cases there. “But many of these new offenders may be doing it because of the economic situation. Maybe they’re hurting at home, and they’re taking a risk they may not take otherwise.”
Much of the stolen merchandise is sold online.
Dave Finley, the president of Leadsonline.com, which offers software that helps store owners track stolen goods being sold online and at pawn shops, said his company had seen a 50 percent increase over the last year in the number of shoplifting investigations handled by the company.
Security experts say retail theft is also being facilitated by Web sites that sell fake receipts that thieves can use to obtain cash refunds for stolen merchandise.
Andreas Carthy, the creator of one such site, denied that he was assisting with fraud.
“We provide a no-questions-asked service,” he said in an e-mail message, adding that his site was intended for people looking for prank gifts or students seeking to inflate spending to get more generous allowances from their parents.
At about $40 each, the Web site — which insists they are “for novelty use only” — sells about 80 fake receipts a month, Mr. Carthy said.
Local law enforcement and retailers have been trying new tactics to battle shoplifting and other forms of retail crime.
In Savannah, Ga., a local convenience store chain has linked its video surveillance to a police station so officers can help monitor the store for shoplifting and other crimes. In Louisiana, the police have been requiring shoplifters, even first-time offenders, to post $1,000 bail or stay in jail until their court date. On Staten Island, malls have started posting the mug shots of repeat shoplifters on video screens.
“There are more of them, and they seem more desperate,” said a store manager about shoplifters at the nation’s largest shopping center, the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minn., which has seen a 19 percent increase in shoplifting this year over last.
The manager, who asked not to be identified because she was not permitted to speak to reporters, said stealing gift cards was especially popular during the holidays.
Shoplifters also seem to be getting bolder, according to industry surveys.
Thieves often put stolen items in bags lined with aluminum foil to avoid detection by the storefront alarms. Others work in teams, with a decoy who tries to look suspicious to draw out undercover security agents and attract the attention of security cameras, the police said.
“We’re definitely seeing more sprinters,” said an undercover security guard at Macy’s in Oakland, Calif., referring to shoplifters who make a run for the door.
The guard said that most large department stores instructed guards not to chase shoplifters more than 100 feet outside the store, because research showed that confrontations tended to become more serious beyond that point.
The holidays are a particularly popular time for pilfering.
About 20 percent of annual retail sales occur in November and December, and even with precautions, the increased customer traffic makes it tougher to track thieves. Moreover, cashiers are rushed by long lines, making them less vigilant about checking for stolen credit cards.
Mr. Johnson, who was arrested last month, said that after being laid off from his $20-an-hour job at a trailer factory a year ago, he took a job for $6.55 an hour at McDonald’s. Six months later, he was laid off and has not been able to find a job since.
He and his two small children rely on his wife’s minimum-wage job at Wal-Mart, groceries from a food bank and help from his mother, he said.
“I just know things are going to get a lot rougher,” said Mr. Johnson, who is awaiting trial. He added that no matter how tough it became, he had no intention of shoplifting again.
Mr. Martin said he was shocked that the store had decided to prosecute him for stealing such a small amount. A manager at Martin’s Supermarket said the store had a policy of prosecuting all shoplifting.
Retail security experts, however, say that people like Mr. Johnson do not pose the biggest threat to stores. People like Tommy Joe Tidwell do.
Mr. Tidwell, 35, pleaded guilty last month to running a shoplifting ring out of Dayton, Ohio, that netted more than $1 million, according to court papers.
After Mr. Tidwell would print fraudulent UPC bar code labels on his home computer, he and several conspirators would place them on items at Wal-Mart and other stores, then buy the merchandise for a fraction of the real price. They would resell the goods on the Internet, according to court papers.
Joe LaRocca, vice president of loss prevention for the National Retail Federation, said that as the holidays approached, retail security workers were keeping a close eye on receipt fraud.
But to entice shoppers, three times as many stores as last year have loosened their return policies, extending the return period and being more lenient with shoppers who lack receipts, according to the federation.
“Retailers are trying to find a balance,” Mr. LaRocca said. “They want to provide good customer service at a time when it’s crucial for customers to be able to shop comfortably or to return unwanted or duplicate gifts.
“But they also want to prevent criminals from taking advantage of them.”
Having trouble viewing the email below? Please click here.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Note: To ensure delivery to your inbox please add william.price@retail-leaders.org to your address book.
Retail Industry Leaders Association
1700 N. Moore Street
Suite 2250
Arlington, VA 22209
This message was intended for: ashley.deboer@rila.org
You were added to the system %?DATEADDED?%. You are receiving this email because your company expressed interest in, or is a member of, the Retail Industry Leaders Association.
For more information click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe
**************************************************************************
This is a test message, this footer is for display purposes only.
You do not have the option to unsubscribe or change your preferences.
![]()
Recent Comments